UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

women Kutztown 2
  
Kutztown              
W-L: ( 9- 8) PR = 94.4752

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 226 A Shepherd PSAC ( 4-12, 90.0) 15- 7 228 H Bentley Northeast 10 (10- 6, 92.6) 16-11 303 H Bloomsburg PSAC ( 7-10, 90.5) 16- 2 307 H Southern New Hampshire Northeast 10 ( 8- 9, 90.9) 16- 7 310 H New Haven Northeast 10 (12- 5, 94.8) 13- 7 313 A Flagler Gulf South (11- 5, 95.8) 10-11 316 A St Leo Sunshine (13- 6, 96.5) 5-13 319 H East Stroudsburg PSAC (14- 5, 95.7) 9-18 322 H Shippensburg PSAC ( 8- 9, 91.9) 14- 7 326 A West Chester PSAC (18- 0, 98.2) 13-14 329 H Millersville PSAC (11- 7, 93.2) 20-12 402 A Bloomsburg PSAC ( 7-10, 90.5) 18-10 409 H Shepherd PSAC ( 4-12, 90.0) 18- 6 412 A East Stroudsburg PSAC (14- 5, 95.7) 9-16 416 H West Chester PSAC (18- 0, 98.2) 13-18 419 A Shippensburg PSAC ( 8- 9, 91.9) 10-11 423 A Millersville PSAC (11- 7, 93.2) 4-10

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   226 A Shepherd               15- 7       8     4           1.09
   228 H Bentley                16-11       5     2    +      2.52
   303 H Bloomsburg             16- 2      14     5           0.46
   307 H Southern New Hampshire 16- 7       9     4           0.88
   310 H New Haven              13- 7       6     0    ++     4.81
   313 A Flagler                10-11      -1    -2           0.90
   316 A St Leo                  5-13      -8    -3    -     -2.42
   319 H East Stroudsburg        9-18      -9    -1    --    -4.29
   322 H Shippensburg           14- 7       7     3           1.85
   326 A West Chester           13-14      -1    -4    +      3.30
   329 H Millersville           20-12       8     2    +      3.15
   402 A Bloomsburg             18-10       8     3           1.57
   409 H Shepherd               18- 6      12     5           0.00
   412 A East Stroudsburg        9-16      -7    -2    -     -3.18
   416 H West Chester           13-18      -5    -3          -1.80
   419 A Shippensburg           10-11      -1     2    -     -3.04
   423 A Millersville            4-10      -6     1    --    -5.74

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   319 H East Stroudsburg        9-18      -9    -1    --    -4.29
   423 A Millersville            4-10      -6     1    --    -5.74
   316 A St Leo                  5-13      -8    -3    -     -2.42
   412 A East Stroudsburg        9-16      -7    -2    -     -3.18
   419 A Shippensburg           10-11      -1     2    -     -3.04

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   310 H New Haven              13- 7       6     0    ++     4.81
   228 H Bentley                16-11       5     2    +      2.52
   326 A West Chester           13-14      -1    -4    +      3.30
   329 H Millersville           20-12       8     2    +      3.15

Kutztown Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adelphi Adelphi insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Kutztown tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Kutztown
American International Kutztown Kutztown   3- 1 vs 0- 4
Anderson (SC) Kutztown insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Kutztown
Ashland Kutztown   Kutztown
Assumption Kutztown Kutztown   3- 1 vs 0- 4
Barton Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) Kutztown
Belmont Abbey Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Bentley Kutztown Kutztown  
Bloomsburg Kutztown Kutztown  
Bridgeport Kutztown   Kutztown
Caldwell Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) Kutztown
Catawba Kutztown   Kutztown
Charleston Kutztown   Kutztown
Chestnut Hill Kutztown   Kutztown
Chowan Kutztown   Kutztown
Coker Kutztown   Kutztown
Colorado Mesa Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Colorado-Colorado Spring Kutztown   Kutztown
Concordia-St Paul Kutztown   Kutztown
Converse Kutztown   Kutztown
CSU-Pueblo Kutztown   Kutztown
D'Youville Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kutztown
Daemen Kutztown   Kutztown
Davenport Kutztown   Kutztown
Davis & Elkins Kutztown   Kutztown
District of Columbia Kutztown   Kutztown
Dominican (CA) Kutztown   Kutztown
Dominican (NY) Dominican (NY) tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Dominican (NY)
East Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg East Stroudsburg  
Edinboro Kutztown   Kutztown
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Emmanuel (GA) Kutztown   Kutztown
Emory & Henry Kutztown   Kutztown
Felician Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kutztown
Findlay Kutztown   Kutztown
Flagler Flagler Flagler  
Florida Southern Florida Southern Florida Southern   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Florida Tech Kutztown tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Kutztown
Fort Lewis Kutztown   Kutztown
Franklin Pierce Kutztown Kutztown   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Frostburg State Kutztown Kutztown   3- 1 vs 0- 3
Gannon Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kutztown
Georgian Court Kutztown Kutztown   3- 1 vs 0- 3
Grand Valley State Kutztown   Kutztown
Holy Family Kutztown Kutztown   2- 1 vs 0- 2
Indiana (PA) Kutztown insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) Kutztown
Indianapolis Indianapolis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Indianapolis
Lake Erie Kutztown   Kutztown
Lander Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Lee Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Lees-McRae Kutztown   Kutztown
Lenoir-Rhyne Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Lewis Kutztown   Kutztown
Limestone Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Lincoln Memorial Kutztown   Kutztown
Lock Haven Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Lynn Lynn Lynn   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Malone Kutztown   Kutztown
Mars Hill Kutztown   Kutztown
Maryville Maryville   Maryville
McKendree Kutztown   Kutztown
Mercy Kutztown insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Kutztown
Millersville Kutztown insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 3) Kutztown
Missouri Western Kutztown   Kutztown
Molloy Kutztown Kutztown   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Montevallo Kutztown tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kutztown
Mount Olive Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Kutztown
New Haven Kutztown Kutztown  
Newberry Kutztown   Kutztown
North Greenville Kutztown   Kutztown
Northern Michigan Kutztown   Kutztown
Northwood Kutztown   Kutztown
Pace Pace insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Kutztown tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Kutztown
Post Kutztown   Kutztown
Quincy Kutztown   Kutztown
Regis (CO) Kutztown   Kutztown
Roberts Wesleyan Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Kutztown
Rockhurst Kutztown   Kutztown
Rollins Rollins tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rollins
Saginaw Valley State Kutztown   Kutztown
Seton Hill Kutztown tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Kutztown
Shepherd Kutztown Kutztown  
Shippensburg Kutztown Kutztown   3- 3 vs 0- 5
Shorter Kutztown   Kutztown
Slippery Rock Slippery Rock insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Slippery Rock
Southern Connecticut Kutztown Kutztown   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Southern New Hampshire Kutztown Kutztown  
Southern Wesleyan Kutztown   Kutztown
St Anselm Kutztown Kutztown   3- 0 vs 1- 2
St Leo St Leo St Leo  
St Michaels Kutztown Kutztown   3- 0 vs 0- 3
St Thomas Aquinas Kutztown   Kutztown
Tampa Tampa insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Tampa
Thomas Jefferson Kutztown Kutztown   3- 2 vs 0- 4
Thomas More Kutztown   Kutztown
Tiffin Kutztown   Kutztown
Tusculum Kutztown   Kutztown
Ursuline Kutztown   Kutztown
UVA Wise Kutztown   Kutztown
Virginia State Kutztown   Kutztown
Walsh Kutztown   Kutztown
West Chester West Chester West Chester  
West Virginia Wesleyan Kutztown   Kutztown
Westminster (UT) Kutztown   Kutztown
Wheeling Kutztown insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kutztown
William Jewell Kutztown   Kutztown
Wilmington (DE) Kutztown Kutztown   3- 2 vs 1- 2
Wingate Kutztown   Kutztown
Young Harris Kutztown   Kutztown

PowerWise = 96


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 16.16

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Shepherd        ( 4-12, 90.0)    15- 7       -9.89      21.29       0.55         0.95            20.77
   0 H Bentley         (10- 6, 92.6)    16-11       -7.35      23.83      -0.55         0.95            22.13
   0 H Bloomsburg      ( 7-10, 90.5)    16- 2       -9.41      21.77      -0.55         0.95            20.17
   0 H Southern New H  ( 8- 9, 90.9)    16- 7       -8.99      22.19      -0.55         0.95            20.57
   0 H New Haven       (12- 5, 94.8)    13- 7       -5.06      26.12      -0.55         0.95            24.31
   0 A Flagler         (11- 5, 95.8)    10-11       -4.08      27.10       0.55         0.95            -3.36
   0 A St Leo          (13- 6, 96.5)     5-13       -3.40      27.78       0.55         0.95            -2.71
   0 H East Stroudsbu  (14- 5, 95.7)     9-18       -4.16      27.02      -0.55         0.95            -4.48
   0 H Shippensburg    ( 8- 9, 91.9)    14- 7       -8.02      23.16      -0.55         0.95            21.49
   0 A West Chester    (18- 0, 98.2)    13-14       -1.68      29.51       0.55         0.95            -1.07
   0 H Millersville    (11- 7, 93.2)    20-12       -6.72      24.46      -0.55         0.95            22.73
   0 A Bloomsburg      ( 7-10, 90.5)    18-10       -9.41      21.77       0.55         0.95            21.22
   0 H Shepherd        ( 4-12, 90.0)    18- 6       -9.89      21.29      -0.55         0.95            19.71
   0 A East Stroudsbu  (14- 5, 95.7)     9-16       -4.16      27.02       0.55         0.95            -3.43
   0 H West Chester    (18- 0, 98.2)    13-18       -1.68      29.51      -0.55         0.95            -2.12
   0 A Shippensburg    ( 8- 9, 91.9)    10-11       -8.02      23.16       0.55         0.95            -7.10
   0 A Millersville    (11- 7, 93.2)     4-10       -6.72      24.46       0.55         0.95            -5.86
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       162.98

winning pts = 193.0907 losing points = -30.1144

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------